| Fretplay : U2 tabs : CD reviews : Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses | Search or browse tablatures: | |||
Audio CD review:
Please note that the below review is the views of the authors, and authors only. You can get a complete list of all U2 reviews here, or go back to the U2 tabs.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U2 - Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses |
|
Band: U2 Title: Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses Rating: Release Date: 1992-11-10 Media: Audio CD Tracks: 1: Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses 2: Paint It Black - U2, Jagger, Mick 3: Fortunate Son - U2, Fogerty, John 4: Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses |
|
Painting it black The remix was really good but the cover of the Rolling Stones Paint it Black was worth the price in and of itself. I did not expect to enjoy this CD as much as I did. They did not try pretend to be the Stones, and fans of the original may not enjoy it, but I thought it was a great cover. I highly recommend it.
However, in this single version (The Temple Bar Edit), that emotion is lost. There is no real peak to the song. . . the song is just lost in a wave of acoustic guitar and lighter drums. The original mood the album version had given off, is hopelessly lost - no more twisted pain, or agonizing guitar riffs, to make this song complete. I can't stand either of the single versions. 'Paint It Black': Great cover. . . rocking just as much now, as when the Stones played it. 'Fortunate Son': A soulful rendition of John Fogerty's song.
"Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses (The Temple Bar Edit)" -- Structurally, this edit is similar to the original, album version. However, it forgoes a lot of the electronic noises in favor of a more straightforward guitar/piano sound. The album version works better alongside its ACHTUNG BABY companions, but this interpretation sounds better as a standalone song. This song isn't one that's overly powerful, but I find myself humming it for days afterwards. A nicely understated work. "Paint It Black" -- A cover of the well-known Rolling Stones song. Comparisons to the original are unavoidable, and while this doesn't come close to achieving that power, it's an interesting version all the same. But Bono's vocals just don't have the same gravity as Mick Jagger's, and Edge isn't as forceful in his guitar playing as Keith Richards is. There's a reason why U2 isn't recognized as a cover band, although some of the stuff they do on this track isn't bad. "Fortunate Son" -- A cover of the well-known Creedence Clearwater Revival song. Much more rhythmic than the original, and, again, not nearly as good. While CCR put a lot of passion and emotion into their song, this version just seems a bit limp and weightless. The female backing vocals are a nice touch, but just not enough to save this one. It's a pity, because I like some of the stuff they do on here. The guitar playing is pretty good, the rythmn section is putting out good beats, and I like the vocal track that Bono lays down. It ends up being far less than the sum of its parts, almost certainly because the original is just so familiar. "Who's Gonna Ride Your Wild Horses (The Temple Bar Remix)" -- Virtually the same as the Temple Bar Edit version albeit slightly longer and with a few added synthesizers. Not one of U2's strongest singles, this is primarily a curiosity for hardcore U2 fans. The different versions of the title track are interesting and worth a listen, while the other two covers are fairly forgettable.
|
| Navigation: |
|
-Fretplay home -Guitar tabs -Bass tabs -Fresh tabs Guitar lessons -How to read tabs -How to write tabs -Submit tabs -Link to us |
| Message forums: |
|
-The pit, General forum -Gear and accessories -Bands and artists -Guitar forum -Bass forum |
| U2 menu: |
|
-U2 tabs -U2 discography -U2 lyrics |